I recently received a comment denouncing the observations and interpretations I made in my article, "Forensic Observation," as well as the excellent documentary I recommended, "American Moon."
Good work man! I admit I skipped the detailed sections on specific "conspiracy theories" 😆 and picked back up at "Final stuff". I'm a psycho-sociologist investigating the psychology of cultism and how it plays out socially, so I focus on the archetypal structures and dynamics common to all of these controversies, as opposed to getting into the details specific to each. I'm trying to wrap up my current draft, *Law Itself Is the Violation* (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZCGm8NYwxAPUfScDhhXayvnChczvHOuj/view), so then I can finish up another one I started, *Truth and the Dishonesties of Belief*. I bet you and I would have oodles to talk about concerning the material in the latter.
Thank you! And of course it goes without saying that I have no entitled expectation of anyone agreeing with or delving into any topic just because I put it in a post. Most important part is trying to wrest legitimacy from the authoritarian mind that has fooled itself and others into believing it's open. Millions take these "experts" at their word and follow their lead. ... I've got your "Law Itself..." open and am about to have a look -- I appreciate the link -- and I'm especially intrigued by your upcoming "Truth and Dishonesties ...." I'll look for it.
The "Law Itself" is still very much a draft manuscript. The latter half is still very rough and incomplete. I'm at page 146 of 360 on what I'm hoping will be the final edit pass.
Feel free to comment, criticize, expand, counter... whatever. I'm less partial to praise, lol. It's nice, but I already know what the material is worth, and praise doesn't help me improve it. 💗
I appreciate the considerable effort you've taken here to so thoroughly rebut one of the world's billions of 'eejits' (I think that's Irish for idiots). Hopefully he read it but as you say, more intelligent minds will recognize the necessity of writing it anyway.
I wore out my brain in "Covid's" early days trying to convince those close to me that it was a hoax. To no avail whatsoever, of course.
"To no avail." I know what you mean. Approximately zero souls would even consider the facts concerning Covid over popular (socially safe) belief, and I saw at least one denier renounce an ancient and deep friendship over the friend's refusal to get the injection.
Thanks for the kind words. My response was too long for a comment -- a character count popped up in red and showed more than 2000 characters too long. In any case, trying to change the mind of true believers is almost always fruitless, with a tendency toward frustration and impoliteness that does nobody any good.
Good work man! I admit I skipped the detailed sections on specific "conspiracy theories" 😆 and picked back up at "Final stuff". I'm a psycho-sociologist investigating the psychology of cultism and how it plays out socially, so I focus on the archetypal structures and dynamics common to all of these controversies, as opposed to getting into the details specific to each. I'm trying to wrap up my current draft, *Law Itself Is the Violation* (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZCGm8NYwxAPUfScDhhXayvnChczvHOuj/view), so then I can finish up another one I started, *Truth and the Dishonesties of Belief*. I bet you and I would have oodles to talk about concerning the material in the latter.
Thank you! And of course it goes without saying that I have no entitled expectation of anyone agreeing with or delving into any topic just because I put it in a post. Most important part is trying to wrest legitimacy from the authoritarian mind that has fooled itself and others into believing it's open. Millions take these "experts" at their word and follow their lead. ... I've got your "Law Itself..." open and am about to have a look -- I appreciate the link -- and I'm especially intrigued by your upcoming "Truth and Dishonesties ...." I'll look for it.
The "Law Itself" is still very much a draft manuscript. The latter half is still very rough and incomplete. I'm at page 146 of 360 on what I'm hoping will be the final edit pass.
Oh, I didn't realize it was a BOOK. Even better.
Feel free to comment, criticize, expand, counter... whatever. I'm less partial to praise, lol. It's nice, but I already know what the material is worth, and praise doesn't help me improve it. 💗
You make it easy. Will definitely do.
I appreciate the considerable effort you've taken here to so thoroughly rebut one of the world's billions of 'eejits' (I think that's Irish for idiots). Hopefully he read it but as you say, more intelligent minds will recognize the necessity of writing it anyway.
I wore out my brain in "Covid's" early days trying to convince those close to me that it was a hoax. To no avail whatsoever, of course.
"To no avail." I know what you mean. Approximately zero souls would even consider the facts concerning Covid over popular (socially safe) belief, and I saw at least one denier renounce an ancient and deep friendship over the friend's refusal to get the injection.
Thanks for the kind words. My response was too long for a comment -- a character count popped up in red and showed more than 2000 characters too long. In any case, trying to change the mind of true believers is almost always fruitless, with a tendency toward frustration and impoliteness that does nobody any good.